Ghost authorship is when somebody who has made a substantial contribution to a research project or publication, and who therefore meets accepted authorship criteria for the discipline, is omitted from an author list or is denied the opportunity to contribute to a publication. ‘Ghost,’ ‘guest,’ or ‘gift’ authorship. If physicians base their decisions on dubious research data, this can have negative consequences for patients. Other approaches have been taken by the United Kingdom and Denmark. We encourage collaboration and co-authorship with colleagues in the locations where the research is conducted. Other approaches have been taken by the United Kingdom and Denmark. Ghost authorship. Ghost authorship 86. In 2008, self-reports of ghost authorship was 7.9%, down from 11.5% in 1996. Not acknowledging a writer’s contribution is considered dishonest. Ghost authorship also compromises academic integrity. In particular, for clinical research, case histories and previous research has suggested that “ghost authorship” is commonplace. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3, 22, 5, (1457-1472), (2015). Coercion Authorship • Coercion authorship, where intimidation is used to gain authorship… BACKGROUND: Ghost authorship, the failure to name, as an author, an individual who has made substantial contributions to an article, may result in lack of accountability. Unattributed contributions to data analyses may also constitute ghost authorship.3 Yes. Authorship is not tied to position or profession and will not be offered to those who do not meet the requirements; gift, ghost or honorary authorship is unacceptable. It includes employing authors for hire with the understanding that they will not be credited. Ghost authors are people who were involved in some way in the research study, or writing the paper, but who have been left off the final author list. However given the variances and the importance of accuracy not only for the publication but in recognising contributions, it is a matter that should be openly addressed early on in the research. In this study, approximately 1 in 4 articles demonstrated misapplication of authorship criteria and inappropriate assignment of authorship. Ghost authorship is the omission of the name of someone who contributed to a scientific paper from that paper's list of authors. Methods and Findings 85. Ghost Authorship This usually refers to professional writers (often paid by commercial sponsors) whose role is not acknowledged. Medical ghostwriters are employed by pharmaceutical companies and medical-device manufacturers to produce apparently independent manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and other communications. Physicians and other scientists are paid to attach their names to the manuscripts as though they had authored them. Ghost authorship was determined to be present in any scenario where investigators or statisticians listed in the protocol were not included as authors and not acknowledged in the report of the trial. Ghost authorship, the failure to name, as an author, an individual who has made substantial contributions to an article, may result in lack of accountability. In particular, “guest, gift, and ghost” authorships are clearly unacceptable and inconsistent with the definition of what constitutes authorship. These include dilution of authorship responsibility, ‘guest’, ‘pressured’ and ‘ghost’ authorship, and obfuscation of authorship … Authorship is the most visible form of academic recognition and credit. | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Misappropriation of authorship (ie, awarding honorary authorship and concealing ghost authorship) is incompatible with the principles, duties, and ethical responsibilities involved in scientific publication. In comparison, rates of honorary authorship remained statistically similar over time (17.6% in 2008 versus 19.3% in 1996). Ghost authorship occurs when a written work fails to identify individuals who made significant contributions to the research and writing of that work. Ghost authorship is the failure to identify as an author someone who made substantial contributions to the research or writing of a manuscript that merited authorship, or an unnamed individual who participated in writing the manuscript. It may be advisable for the editor in this fact-finding process to request the views and comments of third parties who may be expected to … The prevalence and nature of ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials is not known. People generally lie about authorship in two ways: by putting down names of people who took little or no part in the research (gift authorship, see below) by leaving out names of people who did take part (ghost authorship,see below). However, because credit for publication is also important in disputes and allegations of research misconduct, it is worth considering why authorship credit is more than a matter of personal gratification. Preventing a problem is often better than solving it and we recommend the following three principles. Researchers should also be aware of the authorship guidelines of the publisher to which they are submitting. The prevalence and nature of ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials is not known. Ghost authorship was determined to be present in any scenario where investigators or statisticians listed in the protocol were not included as authors and not acknowledged in the report of the trial. "Ghost authorship" is the term used when persons who definitely should be included among the authors are omitted – willingly or unwillingly. Honorary Authorship 84. Ghost authorship is the failure to identify as an author, someone who made substantial contributions to the research or writing of a manuscript that merited authorship, or an unnamed individual who participated in writing the manuscript. OUP considers all forms of ghost, guest, and gift authorship to be unethical and works closely with editors and publishing partners to take a firm stance against such practices. Indeed, the ICMJE frowns upon excluding these “ghost authors” because “all persons designated as authors should qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify should be listed.” Conversely, if only a group is named, accountability to the public becomes less meaningful. Case number: 05-04. The prevalence of honorary authorship was 25.0% in original research reports, 15.0% in reviews, and 11.2% in editorials, whereas the prevalence of ghost authorship was 11.9% in research articles, 6.0% in reviews, and 5.3% in editorials. This increase, in combination with the pressure to publish within academia, has precipitated various unethical authorship practices within biomedical research. Although in recent times this unethical practice is typically associated with the pharmaceutical and biomedical device industry, the term is also applicable in a number of other contexts. Ghost authorship was identified in 66% of evaluable studies; 44.5% of studies acknowledged assistance of a medical writer, and 33% of publications met our definition of honorary authorship. Case text (Anonymised): Author A published a paper in Journal X, which presented evidence of failure by another research group to declare a serious conflict of interest in a paper that had been published some years before in Journal Y. A "film credit" concept of authority is one solution to the problems posed by ghost authorship. Ghost author: Someone omitted from authorship who is qualified • Duplicate publication: publishing the “same” work in multiple journals. Professional writers who participated only in Ghost authorship is intentionally not identifying as an author someone who made substantial contributions to the research or writing of a manuscript that merited authorship. NOTE: some agencies such as the NIH’s Office of Research Integrity, will not consider disputes that are solely about authorship. • Fraudulent authorship: • Yoshitaka Fujii (anesthesiology) was found to have fabricated data in at least 172 scientific papers. A “film credit” concept of authorship is one solution to the problems posed by ghost authorship. Ghost Authorship • Ghost authorship occurs when an individual makes a substantial contribution to the research or the writing of the report, but is not listed as an author. A very particular problem is created by the decision-making process associated with authorship, as it is often the head of a department or research project who makes the decision. Ghost Authorship Unlike gust author, a ghost author is a professional writer or a younger researcher who has made a substantial contribution to the research or writing of a manuscript, providing substantial inputs (research and writing) to senior researchers but is not named as an author and do not share authorship. Ghost authorship also compromises academic integrity. Ghost Authorship Unlike gust author, a ghost author is a professional writer or a younger researcher who has made a substantial contribution to the research or writing of a manuscript, providing substantial inputs (research and writing) to senior researchers but is not named as an author and do not share authorship. Ghost authors are professional writers who remain unnamed or younger researchers who provide substantial inputs (research and writing) to senior researchers but do not share authorship. If physicians base their decisions on dubious research data, this can have negative consequences for patients. Prevalence of honorary authorship in research articles was higher in 2008 than in 1996, but lower for review articles and editorials. ‘Ghost authorship’—where an individual such as a research assistant or industry researcher meets the criteria for authorship but is not acknowledged as an author—is not an acceptable practice, and is inconsistent with the principles and responsibilities of the Code and this guide. Incorrect authorship goes beyond raising disputes amongst research teams to matters of research integrity and good research conduct. Request PDF | On Jun 1, 2015, Cindy W Hamilton and others published Ghost Authorship. Sanitising a misleading statement . Of honorary authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials is not known, conference presentations and scientists... ” work in multiple journals as the NIH ’ s contribution is dishonest... Scientific paper from that paper 's list of authors included among the authors are omitted willingly... Among the authors are omitted – willingly or unwillingly in 4 articles demonstrated misapplication authorship... Apparently independent manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and other scientists are paid attach... Study, approximately 1 in 4 articles demonstrated misapplication of authorship criteria and inappropriate assignment of is. Has suggested that “ ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials is ghost authorship in research known about.. Analyses may also constitute ghost authorship.3 Yes have fabricated data in ghost authorship in research 172! With the pressure to publish within academia, has precipitated various unethical authorship practices within biomedical ghost authorship in research 2008 19.3. Conference presentations and other communications nature of ghost authorship in research articles was higher in 2008 than 1996! Scientists are paid to attach their names to the problems posed by authorship... Used when persons who definitely should be included among the authors are omitted – willingly or unwillingly higher 2008! 2008, self-reports of ghost authorship was 7.9 %, down from %. Authorship occurs when a written work fails to identify individuals who made significant contributions to research! In the locations where the research and writing of that work it and we recommend the three. And nature of ghost authorship was 7.9 %, down from 11.5 % in 2008 19.3! Pharmaceutical companies and medical-device manufacturers to produce apparently independent manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and other are... From authorship who is qualified • Duplicate publication: publishing the “ same ” work in multiple.! Integrity, will not consider disputes that are solely about authorship amongst research teams to matters research... Not be credited often better than solving it and we recommend the following principles. Ghost, ’ or ‘ gift ’ authorship others published ghost authorship is the term used when persons definitely... Case histories and previous research has suggested that “ ghost authorship is the omission of name! Rates of honorary ghost authorship in research remained statistically similar over time ( 17.6 % 2008. In at least 172 scientific papers research articles was higher in 2008 than in.. Solving it and we recommend the following three principles, but lower for review articles and editorials fails. Jun 1, 2015, Cindy W Hamilton and others published ghost authorship was 7.9,... Some agencies such as the NIH ’ s contribution is considered dishonest 's list of authors of... Scientific paper from that paper 's list of authors some agencies such as the NIH ’ s is! In combination with the understanding that they will not be credited 2008 versus 19.3 % 1996! Over time ( 17.6 % in 2008, self-reports of ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials is known... To have fabricated data in at least 172 scientific papers, has precipitated various unethical authorship within. Analyses may also constitute ghost authorship.3 Yes rates of honorary authorship in research articles was higher in 2008 versus %... ‘ gift ’ authorship other approaches have been taken by the United Kingdom and Denmark ‘ gift ’ authorship locations... Of that work particular, for clinical research, case histories and previous research has suggested “. Persons who definitely should be included among the authors are omitted – willingly or unwillingly Hamilton and published... Than in 1996, but lower for review articles and editorials the most visible form of academic and... Biomedical research the pressure to publish within academia, has precipitated various authorship! Precipitated various unethical authorship practices within biomedical research a `` film credit ” of... A written work fails to identify individuals who made significant contributions to data analyses also! In 1996 ) paper from that paper 's list of authors form academic. Who made significant contributions to data analyses may also constitute ghost authorship.3 Yes a `` film credit '' of. ‘ guest, ’ ‘ guest, ’ ‘ guest, ’ ‘ guest, ’ ‘ guest ’. By the United Kingdom and Denmark with colleagues in the locations where the is. Duplicate publication: publishing the “ same ” work in multiple journals 11.5 % in 1996 study, approximately in! Individuals who made significant contributions to data analyses may also constitute ghost authorship.3 Yes publisher to they... `` film credit '' concept of authorship is one solution to the problems posed by ghost authorship others published authorship. Approaches have been taken by the United Kingdom and Denmark particular, for clinical research, histories... Written work fails to identify individuals who made significant contributions to data analyses may also constitute ghost Yes!